[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jNq77xPXxeYeq_JJBCfekVPVPOye1mZwpQi=+=MKSS7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:07:04 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
nouveau <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pci: prevent putting nvidia GPUs into lower device
states on certain intel bridges
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:13 AM Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> so while trying to test with d3cold disabled, I noticed that I run
> into the exact same error.
Does this mean that you disabled d3cold on the GPU via sysfs (the
"d3cold_allowed" attribute was 0) and the original problem still
occurred in that configuration?
> And I verified that the
> \_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._STA returns 1, which indicates it should still be
> turned on.
I don't really understand this comment, so can you explain it a bit to
me, please?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists