linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: add batch ops testing to array bpf map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:22:05 +0000
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>
CC:     Brian Vazquez <brianvv.kernel@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Petar Penkov <ppenkov@...gle.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: add batch ops testing to
 array bpf map



On 11/21/19 1:14 PM, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing it!
> 
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:43 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/19/19 11:30 AM, Brian Vazquez wrote:
>>> Tested bpf_map_lookup_batch() and bpf_map_update_batch()
>>> functionality.
>>>
>>>     $ ./test_maps
>>>         ...
>>>           test_map_lookup_and_delete_batch_array:PASS
>>>         ...
>>
>> The test is for lookup_batch() and update_batch()
>> and the test name and func name is lookup_and_delete_batch(),
>> probably rename is to lookup_and_update_batch_array()?
>>
> Yes, you are right, I will change the name for next version.
> 
>> It would be good if generic lookup_and_delete_batch()
>> and delete_patch() can be tested as well.
>> Maybe tried to use prog_array?
> 
>   I did test generic_lookup_and_delete_batch with hmap and it worked
> fine because I didn't have concurrent deletions.
> But yes I will add tests for generic delete and lookup_and_delete,
> maybe for the trie map (prog_array doesn't support lookup ang hence
> lookup_and_delete won't apply there)?

trie_map is a good choice. Basically any map which can be used to test
this API.