[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191122100821.012496305@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:28:12 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jari Ruusu <jari.ruusu@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 101/159] x86/atomic: Fix smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
commit 69d927bba39517d0980462efc051875b7f4db185 upstream.
Recent probing at the Linux Kernel Memory Model uncovered a
'surprise'. Strongly ordered architectures where the atomic RmW
primitive implies full memory ordering and
smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic() are a simple barrier() (such as x86)
fail for:
*x = 1;
atomic_inc(u);
smp_mb__after_atomic();
r0 = *y;
Because, while the atomic_inc() implies memory order, it
(surprisingly) does not provide a compiler barrier. This then allows
the compiler to re-order like so:
atomic_inc(u);
*x = 1;
smp_mb__after_atomic();
r0 = *y;
Which the CPU is then allowed to re-order (under TSO rules) like:
atomic_inc(u);
r0 = *y;
*x = 1;
And this very much was not intended. Therefore strengthen the atomic
RmW ops to include a compiler barrier.
NOTE: atomic_{or,and,xor} and the bitops already had the compiler
barrier.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jari Ruusu <jari.ruusu@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static __always_inline void atomic_add(i
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addl %1,%0"
: "+m" (v->counter)
- : "ir" (i));
+ : "ir" (i) : "memory");
}
/**
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static __always_inline void atomic_sub(i
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subl %1,%0"
: "+m" (v->counter)
- : "ir" (i));
+ : "ir" (i) : "memory");
}
/**
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static __always_inline int atomic_sub_an
static __always_inline void atomic_inc(atomic_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "incl %0"
- : "+m" (v->counter));
+ : "+m" (v->counter) :: "memory");
}
/**
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static __always_inline void atomic_inc(a
static __always_inline void atomic_dec(atomic_t *v)
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "decl %0"
- : "+m" (v->counter));
+ : "+m" (v->counter) :: "memory");
}
/**
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static __always_inline void atomic64_add
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "addq %1,%0"
: "=m" (v->counter)
- : "er" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "er" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
}
/**
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static inline void atomic64_sub(long i,
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "subq %1,%0"
: "=m" (v->counter)
- : "er" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "er" (i), "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
}
/**
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static __always_inline void atomic64_inc
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "incq %0"
: "=m" (v->counter)
- : "m" (v->counter));
+ : "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
}
/**
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static __always_inline void atomic64_dec
{
asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "decq %0"
: "=m" (v->counter)
- : "m" (v->counter));
+ : "m" (v->counter) : "memory");
}
/**
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ do { \
#endif
/* Atomic operations are already serializing on x86 */
-#define smp_mb__before_atomic() barrier()
-#define smp_mb__after_atomic() barrier()
+#define smp_mb__before_atomic() do { } while (0)
+#define smp_mb__after_atomic() do { } while (0)
#endif /* _ASM_X86_BARRIER_H */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists