linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 217/220] tools: PCI: Fix broken pcitest compilation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191123215527.GA22003@duo.ucw.cz>
Date:   Sat, 23 Nov 2019 22:55:28 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@...ive.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 217/220] tools: PCI: Fix broken pcitest compilation

Hi!

> From: Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@...ive.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 8a5e0af240e07dd3d4897eb8ff52aab757da7fab ]
> 
> pcitest is currently broken due to the following compiler error
> and related warning. Fix by changing the run_test() function
> signature to return an integer result.
> 
> pcitest.c: In function run_test:
> pcitest.c:143:9: warning: return with a value, in function
> returning void
>   return (ret < 0) ? ret : 1 - ret; /* return 0 if test succeeded */

There is no such line in 4.19 version.

> +++ b/tools/pci/pcitest.c
> @@ -47,15 +47,15 @@ struct pci_test {
>  	unsigned long	size;
>  };
>  
> -static void run_test(struct pci_test *test)
> +static int run_test(struct pci_test *test)
>  {
> -	long ret;
> +	int ret = -EINVAL;
>  	int fd;

...
        fflush(stdout);
}

No, sorry, this will bring back warning fef31ecaaf2c was supposed to
fix.

My recommendation would be to drop this and fef31ecaaf2c from the
stable. It is warning, not a "serious bug" after all.

Alternatively, it needs to return something at the end of function,
after the fflush().

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)