linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:35:16 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next
 tree

On 11/25/19 8:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> Commits
> 
>    5940c5bf6504 ("selftests, bpftool: Skip the build test if not in tree")
>    31f8b8295bb8 ("selftests, bpftool: Set EXIT trap after usage function")
>    a89b2cbf71d6 ("tools, bpf: Fix build for 'make -s tools/bpf O=<dir>'")
>    a0f17cc6665c ("tools, bpftool: Fix warning on ignored return value for 'read'")
>    5d946c5abbaf ("xsk: Fix xsk_poll()'s return type")
> 
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committers.
> 
> Presumably because the bpf-next tree has been rebased before asking you
> to merge it.  :-(

Yep, the tree has been rebased onto net-next in order to avoid an ugly merge
conflict. My maintainer SOB is still there fwiw, but I guess in this situation
would probably have been good add both of ours. Sorry for the trouble.

Thanks,
Daniel