[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB348579B485FC139EDA222B0C984A0@VI1PR0402MB3485.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 08:02:45 +0000
From: Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@....com>
To: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Aymen Sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
Vipul Kumar <vipul_kumar@...tor.com>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] crypto: caam - RNG4 TRNG errata
On 11/21/2019 5:56 PM, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> The TRNG as used in RNG4, used in CAAM has a documentation issue. The
I assume the "erratum" consists in RTMCTL[TRNG_ACC] bit
not being documented, correct?
Is there an ID of the erratum?
Or at least do you know what parts / SoCs have incorrect documentation?
> effect is that it is possible that the entropy used to instantiate the
> DRBG may be old entropy, rather than newly generated entropy. There is
> proper programming guidance, but it is not in the documentation.
>
Is the "programming guidance" public?
Thanks,
Horia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists