linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 028/237] Btrfs: fix alignment in declaration and prototype of btrfs_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191125140121.GD5861@sasha-vm>
Date:   Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:01:21 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     dsterba@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Liu Bo <bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 028/237] Btrfs: fix alignment in declaration
 and prototype of btrfs_get_extent

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:11:43PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 10:37:43AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: Liu Bo <bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit de2c6615dcddf2af868c5cbd1db2e9e73b4beb58 ]
>>
>> This fixes btrfs_get_extent to be consistent with our existing
>> declaration style.
>
>The patch is pure white space fix with no effects. I don't see that it
>would be needed for a followup patch. What was the reason to add it to
>autosel/stable ?

Oh I grabbed it as a dependency for a follow up patch which I ended up
dropping, and forgot this one in. I'll drop it as well, sorry for the
noise.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha