lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegt_haMDwd6jo3mQzX2vchk_LLMH+V+h4yDs7geLmo4NhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:14:01 +0100
From:   Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:     Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
        overlayfs <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] allow unprivileged overlay mounts

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 3:43 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > Can you please have a look at this patchset?
> >
> > The most interesting one is the last oneliner adding FS_USERNS_MOUNT;
> > whether I'm correct in stating that this isn't going to introduce any
> > holes, or not...
>
> I will take some time and dig through this.
>
> From a robustness standpoint I worry about the stackable filesystem
> side.  As that is uniquely an attack vector with overlayfs.
>
> There is definitely demand for this.

Hi Eric,

Have you had time to look into this yet?

Thanks,
Miklos

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ