[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7t7e3o9d9r.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:38:56 -0500
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
To: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@....org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, ovs dev <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] openvswitch: support asymmetric conntrack
Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com> writes:
> Pravin Shelar <pshelar@....org> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:07 PM Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The openvswitch module shares a common conntrack and NAT infrastructure
>>> exposed via netfilter. It's possible that a packet needs both SNAT and
>>> DNAT manipulation, due to e.g. tuple collision. Netfilter can support
>>> this because it runs through the NAT table twice - once on ingress and
>>> again after egress. The openvswitch module doesn't have such capability.
>>>
>>> Like netfilter hook infrastructure, we should run through NAT twice to
>>> keep the symmetry.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 05752523e565 ("openvswitch: Interface with NAT.")
>>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
>>
>> The patch looks ok. But I am not able apply it. can you fix the encoding.
>
> Hrrm. I didn't make any special changes (just used git send-email). I
> will look at spinning a second patch.
Pravin,
I tried the following:
10:36:59 aconole@...p-25 {(312434617cb1...)} ~/git/linux$ curl http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1192219/mbox/ > test.patch
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 4827 100 4827 0 0 8824 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 8808
10:37:21 aconole@...p-25 {(312434617cb1...)} ~/git/linux$ git am test.patch
Applying: openvswitch: support asymmetric conntrack
10:37:24 aconole@...p-25 {(f759cc2b7323...)} ~/git/linux$
Can you check your mailer settings? The patchwork mbox worked fine, and
I was able to apply from my own mbox as well.
-Aaron
Powered by blists - more mailing lists