linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/12] ACPI/sleep: Convert acpi_wakeup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191125170034.GB12178@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:00:34 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
        "VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] ACPI/sleep: Convert acpi_wakeup_address into a
 function

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:48:03AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:21:20 AM CET Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > Convert acpi_wakeup_address from a raw variable into a function so that
> > > x86 can wrap its dereference of the real mode boot header in a function
> > > instead of broadcasting it to the world via a #define.  This sets the
> > > stage for a future patch to move the definition of acpi_wakeup_address()
> > > out of asm/acpi.h and thus break acpi.h's dependency on asm/realmode.h.
> > > 
> > > No functional change intended.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > 
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > > @@ -63,9 +63,9 @@ static int acpi_sleep_prepare(u32 acpi_state)
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
> > >  	/* do we have a wakeup address for S2 and S3? */
> > >  	if (acpi_state == ACPI_STATE_S3) {
> > > -		if (!acpi_wakeup_address)
> > > +		if (!acpi_wakeup_address())
> > >  			return -EFAULT;
> > > -		acpi_set_waking_vector(acpi_wakeup_address);
> > > +		acpi_set_waking_vector(acpi_wakeup_address());
> > >  
> 
> You might want to store result in a variable... especially since you are
> turning inline function into real one in a next patch.
> 
> And maybe function should be called get_acip_wakeup_address or
> something? This way it is easy to mistake actual wakeup address from
> function that gets it...

Agreed on both counts.


Ingo,

Would you prefer a v2 of the entire series (with Acks and removal of Fixes),
or a v2 that includes only the last two patches?