linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam - do not reset pointer size if caam_ptr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB3485FCCAA68F78EAA9F1B360984A0@VI1PR0402MB3485.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:00:38 +0000
From:   Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@....com>
To:     Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Aymen Sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
        Alison Wang <alison.wang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam - do not reset pointer size if caam_ptr_size
 is 64 bits

On 11/25/2019 2:02 PM, Iuliana Prodan wrote:
> So, what's your suggestion? We shouldn't reset the MCFGR[PS] at all? We 
> should use the value set by u-boot?
> Yes.

Horia