[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191125.111433.742571582032938766.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:14:33 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
CC: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: bpf and local lock
Thomas,
I am working on eliminating the explicit softirq disables around BPF
program invocation and replacing it with local lock usage instead.
We would really need to at least have the non-RT stubs upstream to
propagate this cleanly, do you think this is possible?
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists