[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191126081019.GA98591@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:10:19 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v5.5
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> Linus,
>
> Please pull the latest core-rcu-for-linus git tree from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git core-rcu-for-linus
>
> # HEAD: 43e0ae7ae0f567a3f8c10ec7a4078bc482660921 Merge branch 'for-mingo' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu into core/rcu
> kernel/workqueue.c | 10 +-
Merge conflict note, the following commit from the RCU tree:
5a6446626d7e: ("workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check")
... will conflict with the following commit from the workqueue tree,
which you already pulled:
49e9d1a9faf2: ("workqueue: Add RCU annotation for pwq list walk")
The merge conflict was also noted by Stephen:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191118150858.1a436a12@canb.auug.org.au
The correct resolution is to pick the 5a6446626d7e side, as it's the
latest, best variant of this iteration - you can find this resolution in
tip:master as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists