[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHpGcMJO_bzsc+9Ta7VoKkszR2_v1BqqBZ4=7re=j7OxcX-R1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:08:12 +0100
From: Andreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
cluster-devel <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] gfs2: Rework read and page fault locking
Am Mo., 25. Nov. 2019 um 10:16 Uhr schrieb Kirill A. Shutemov
<kirill@...temov.name>:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 12:53:24AM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > @@ -778,15 +804,51 @@ static ssize_t gfs2_file_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> >
> > static ssize_t gfs2_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
> > {
> > + struct gfs2_inode *ip;
> > + struct gfs2_holder gh;
> > + size_t written = 0;
>
> 'written' in a read routine?
It's a bit weird, but it's the same as in generic_file_buffered_read.
> --
> Kirill A. Shutemov
Thanks,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists