[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191126122917.GA37833@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 12:29:18 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
arnd@...db.de, dvyukov@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] asm-generic/atomic: Use __always_inline for pure
wrappers
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:41:19PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> Prefer __always_inline for atomic wrappers. When building for size
> (CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE), some compilers appear to be less inclined to
> inline even relatively small static inline functions that are assumed to
> be inlinable such as atomic ops. This can cause problems, for example in
> UACCESS regions.
>
> By using __always_inline, we let the real implementation and not the
> wrapper determine the final inlining preference.
>
> For x86 tinyconfig we observe:
> - vmlinux baseline: 1316204
> - vmlinux with patch: 1315988 (-216 bytes)
>
> This came up when addressing UACCESS warnings with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
> in the KCSAN runtime:
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/58708908-84a0-0a81-a836-ad97e33dbb62@infradead.org
>
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * Add missing '#include <linux/compiler.h>'
> * Add size diff to commit message.
>
> v1: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191122154221.247680-1-elver@google.com
> ---
> include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h | 335 +++++++++++-----------
> include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h | 331 ++++++++++-----------
> scripts/atomic/gen-atomic-instrumented.sh | 7 +-
> scripts/atomic/gen-atomic-long.sh | 3 +-
> 4 files changed, 340 insertions(+), 336 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/scripts/atomic/gen-atomic-instrumented.sh b/scripts/atomic/gen-atomic-instrumented.sh
> index 8b8b2a6f8d68..86d27252b988 100755
> --- a/scripts/atomic/gen-atomic-instrumented.sh
> +++ b/scripts/atomic/gen-atomic-instrumented.sh
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ gen_proto_order_variant()
> [ ! -z "${guard}" ] && printf "#if ${guard}\n"
>
> cat <<EOF
> -static inline ${ret}
> +static __always_inline ${ret}
> ${atomicname}(${params})
> {
> ${checks}
> @@ -146,17 +146,18 @@ cat << EOF
> #ifndef _ASM_GENERIC_ATOMIC_INSTRUMENTED_H
> #define _ASM_GENERIC_ATOMIC_INSTRUMENTED_H
>
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> #include <linux/build_bug.h>
Sorry for the (super) trivial nit, but could you please re-order these
two alphabetically, i.e.
#include <linux/build_bug.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
With that:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
[...]
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ cat << EOF
> #ifndef _ASM_GENERIC_ATOMIC_LONG_H
> #define _ASM_GENERIC_ATOMIC_LONG_H
>
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
> #include <asm/types.h>
Unlike the above, this doesn't need to be re-ordered; for whatever
reason, linux/* includes typically come before asm/* includes.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists