[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+PpKPkecQmqZya_iHP9bMvfrz-mYEP0bazAtWj1YbE-uTfCOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:09:43 +0800
From: Hao Lee <haolee.swjtu@...il.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix comments related to node reclaim
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 17:42, Anshuman Khandual
<anshuman.khandual@....com> wrote:
> On 11/25/2019 07:50 PM, Hao Lee wrote:
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/capability.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/capability.h
> > @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ struct vfs_ns_cap_data {
> > /* Allow enabling/disabling tagged queuing on SCSI controllers and sending
> > arbitrary SCSI commands */
> > /* Allow setting encryption key on loopback filesystem */
> > -/* Allow setting zone reclaim policy */
> > +/* Allow setting node reclaim policy */
>
> Does this point to the capability for accessing vm.zone_reclaim_mode = 0
> sysctl knob ? In that case we should not be changing the name here as the
> interface still retains the original name 'zone_reclaim_mode'.
Yes. This comment should be consistent with sysctl documentation and
interface. Thanks for your correction!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists