[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45feed391bbd95c46f64b31cf8817d4f773c8da1.camel@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 19:51:59 +0100
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dma-mapping: treat dev->bus_dma_mask as a DMA limit
On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 16:33 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 25/11/2019 7:44 am, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > Just as an FYI, this introduces a warning on arm32 allyesconfig for me:
> >
> > I think the dma_limit argument to iommu_dma_alloc_iova should be a u64
> > and/or we need to use min_t and open code the zero exception.
> >
> > Robin, Nicolas - any opinions?
>
> Yeah, given that it's always held a mask I'm not entirely sure why it
> was ever a dma_addr_t rather than a u64. Unless anyone else is desperate
> to do it I'll get a cleanup patch ready for rc1.
Sounds good to me too
Robin, since I started the mess, I'll be happy to do it if it helps offloading
some work from you.
Regards,
Nicolas
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists