linux-kernel - Re: AVX register corruption from signal delivery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191126230038.GI31379@zn.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:38 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:     Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>, austin@...gle.com,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: AVX register corruption from signal delivery

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 02:30:10PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> If we do this, we should have selftests/x86/slow or otherwise have a
> fast vs slow mode. I really like that the entire suite takes under 2s.

Sure, we can stick it under a separate Makefile target called "full" or
so to mean, run the full set of tests. We can run the fast ones first
and the slow ones then. Or something to that effect.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette