[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191127083123.0257d2c450bfd87b0691300d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 08:31:23 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX PATCH v4 2/4] selftests/ftrace: Fix ftrace test cases
to check unsupported
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 12:49:01 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 17:34:24 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_cpumask.tc
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_cpumask.tc
> > @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ if [ $NP -eq 1 ] ;then
> > exit_unresolved
> > fi
> >
> > +if ! grep -q function available_tracers ; then
> > + echo "Function trace is not enabled"
> > + exit_unsupported
> > +fi
> > +
> > ORIG_CPUMASK=`cat tracing_cpumask`
>
> Strange, but the bashism test failed:
>
> ++ checkbashisms /work/git-local/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_cpumask.tc
> possible bashism in /work/git-local/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_cpumask.tc line 18 ('function' is useless):
> if ! grep -q function available_tracers ; then
>
> Not sure why it did not like that line. Maybe my bashism check got
> confused by the key word "function"?
>
> Yep!
>
> By adding quotes around "function" it doesn't complain:
>
> if ! grep -q "function" available_tracers ; then
>
> May need to add that.
Thanks! Shuah, can I update this patch?
I'll send it asap.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists