[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191127211109.GF14290@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 23:11:09 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Move setting of TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ into
tpm_tis_probe_irq_single
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:49:49AM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> On Sat Nov 16 19, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > On 11/14/19 11:44 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 06:41:51PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:27:25PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > > From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Move the setting of the TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ for irq probing into
> > > > > tpm_tis_probe_irq_single before calling tpm_tis_gen_interrupt.
> > > > > This move handles error conditions better that may arise if anything
> > > > > before fails in tpm_tis_probe_irq_single.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > > > Suggested-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
> > > > What about just changing the condition?
> > > Also cannot take this since it is not a bug (no fixes tag).
> >
> > I'll repost but will wait until Jerry has tested it on that machine.
> >
> > Stefan
> >
> >
> > >
> > > /Jarkko
> >
> >
>
> It appears they still have the problem. I'm still waiting on logistics
> to send me a system to debug.
Which hardware is guaranteed to ignite this? I can try to get test hw
for this from somewhere. Kind of looking into this blinded ATM. Dan?
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists