[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191127210133.GC14290@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 23:01:33 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com,
"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>,
"Ayoun, Serge" <serge.ayoun@...el.com>, shay.katz-zamir@...el.com,
"Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
"Svahn, Kai" <kai.svahn@...el.com>, bp@...en8.de,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, luto@...nel.org,
kai.huang@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com, cedric.xing@...el.com,
Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v23 00/24] Intel SGX foundations
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:08:24AM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> The Enarx (https://enarx.io) project is eager to see these patches
> merged. We have tested them on the hardware we have available to us
> and haven't noticed any problems.
There was one regression in reclaimer code in v23. I'm also making a
small API change to v24 i.e. have @count for number of bytes processed
in ADD_PAGES ioctl.
Is it possible to test this in v24 once it is available and potentially
give tested-by to the driver patch if it works for you?
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists