linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b2cbe247a33dd9f6c747fce180f964b88d5dc70a.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:32:39 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@...il.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-amlogic <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Use the correct style for SPDX
 License Identifier

On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 22:12 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:59 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 21:55 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > > However, if we're touching these lines anyway, shouldn't we be updating
> > > the SPDX Identifier to GPL-2.0-only while at it?
> > 
> > Probably better to do that with a treewide script one day.
> 
> Yeah... But it's already more than one year after
> 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/16/487
> 
> and Documentation/process/license-rules.rst (which is the authoritive
> rule?) still hasn't been updated...

The patch still applies today...