linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (bpf/btf)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8fa2ace8-c3a5-7d7d-b867-9f1c70981541@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:45:30 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 19 (bpf/btf)

On 11/19/19 7:13 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/19/19 12:46 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20191118:
>>
> 
> on i386 or x86_64:
> 
> ../kernel/bpf/btf.c:3466:1: error: empty enum is invalid
>  };
>  ^
> 
> when CONFIG_NET is not set/enabled.
> 
> 

Still seeing this on linux-next of 20191127.

-- 
~Randy
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>