[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbX-RQY+0Sa6x3BFeovNb3vSkTTnZjcXDDFEyDQWms6zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 08:58:18 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@...sung.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: modularize samsung pinctrl driver
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:14 AM Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@...sung.com> wrote:
> I would like to apply GKI on the pinctrl driver
> So I would like to cut off dependency from ARCH_EXYNOS.
If the pins need to be configured for the system to boot that needs
to be in the big kernel image anyway. And then it should be bool.
Example: to mount the root filesystem on external flash pin
configuration needs to happen.
There is a slight paradigm shift sometimes: in distribution
kernels it might be required that necessary modules are
included in an initramfs attached to the kernel. I do not know
if we want to encourage that type of configuration for embedded
ARM.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists