[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0gUWf_+ZmscuFanvPG=wN09ELL-JpByjJJM4Lo1FYmrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:01:06 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
"(Exiting) Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Lyra Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Add MMC software queue support
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:00 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:17:15PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> If requests are batched enough we could just drain
> and switch every time an other partition access comes in. Especially
> so if people only use partitions for boot partitions and other rarely
> used areas.
We only support a single user partition plus up to two boot partitions that
are accessed rarely, I don't think there is any reason to optimize switching
between them.
The only change that I think we need here is to change the partition switch
from something that is done synchronously during ->queue_rq() to
something that fits better into normal scheme of sending a cmd to
the device, returning BLK_STS_RESOURCE from ->queue_rq.
Possibly this could even be turned into a standard struct request that is
added between two normal requests for different partitions at some
point, if this simplifies the logic (I suspect it won't, but it may be worth
a try).
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists