[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191127172528.GB10957@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:25:28 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] treewide: break dependencies on x86's RM header
* Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> wrote:
> > You didn't include every patch from v1 though, such us my fix to
> > Quark:
> >
> > [PATCH] x86/platform/intel/quark: Explicitly include linux/io.h for virt_to_phys()
> >
> > I've applied that one too and your updated patches, and it's now all
> > pushed out into tip:WIP.core/headers.
>
> Sorry, it wasn't clear to me whether or not to include that one. Next
> time I'll ask.
No problem - in general it's best to include all, because in general it's
much easier for maintainers to leave out something than to remember to
add it back in. ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists