[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191128004752.35268-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 08:47:49 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: <pmladek@...e.com>, <joe@...ches.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <tj@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning
Use pr_warn() instead of the remaining pr_warning() calls.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index bc88fd939f4e..cfc923558e04 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4374,8 +4374,8 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
if (WARN_ON(pwq_busy(pwq))) {
- pr_warning("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n",
- __func__, wq->name);
+ pr_warn("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n",
+ __func__, wq->name);
show_pwq(pwq);
spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists