[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3691620.GRZi0niZ3p@sven-edge>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:03:13 +0100
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+a229d8d995b74f8c4b6c@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
a@...table.cc, b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiří Pírko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mareklindner@...mailbox.ch,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, sw@...onwunderlich.de,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
vinicius.gomes@...el.com, wang.yi59@....com.cn,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING in mark_lock (3)
On Thursday, 28 November 2019 09:54:15 CET Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
[...]
> > I was thinking more about rerunning the same bisect but tell it to assume
> > "crashed: general protection fault in batadv_iv_ogm_queue_add" as OK instead
> > of assuming that it is a crashed like the previous "crashed: WARNING in
> > mark_lock". Just to get a non-bogus bisect result. Or try to rerun the
> > bisect between 40e220b4218b and 89d57dddd7d319ded00415790a0bb3c954b7e386
>
> But... but this done by a program. What do you mean by "tell it"?
Sorry that I asked about what the infrastructure around syzbot can do and
how the interaction with it looks like.
Kind regards,
Sven
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists