[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1574954383.21204.11.camel@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:19:43 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
syzbot <syzbot+9ca7a12fd736d93e0232@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: andreyknvl@...gle.com, hverkuil@...all.nl,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
mchehab@...nel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in si470x_int_in_callback (2)
Am Mittwoch, den 27.11.2019, 16:11 -0500 schrieb Alan Stern:
> Oliver:
>
> Make of this what you will...
Hi,
first, thank you. Second, this is teaching me to question my
assumptions. There is no disconnect at all. We are busy looping
in the error handler as we have virtual hardware in this test,
which can execute an URB without waiting for hardware.
So should we kill error handling for this case?
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists