lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Nov 2019 11:41:27 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
        Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the mailbox tree with the devicetree
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the mailbox tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/stm32-ipcc.txt

between commit:

  4360bf724483 ("dt-bindings: mailbox: convert stm32-ipcc to json-schema")

from the devicetree tree and commit:

  9b2cfd3fb09e ("dt-bindings: mailbox: stm32-ipcc: Updates for wakeup management")

from the mailbox tree.

I fixed it up (I just deleted the file - presumably there will need to be
followup fixes to the json file) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ