linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] rtc: rtc-rc5t619: add ricoh rc5t619 RTC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191129122501.6cecc7f2@kemnade.info>
Date:   Fri, 29 Nov 2019 12:25:01 +0100
From:   Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     lee.jones@...aro.org, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        phh@....me, b.galvani@...il.com, stefan@...er.ch,
        letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] rtc: rtc-rc5t619: add ricoh rc5t619 RTC driver

On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:55:00 +0100
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:

> On 29/11/2019 07:59:40+0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > > > +	/* disable interrupt */
> > > > +	err = rc5t619_rtc_alarm_enable(&pdev->dev, 0);
> > > > +	if (err)
> > > > +		return err;    
> > > 
> > > Is it really useful to disable the alarm to reenable them later?
> > >   
> > Well, yes, seems to be nonsense.
> > Am I right that I do not need to prevent alarm irqs between
> > alloc() and register()?
> >   
> 
> That's fine, the core will be ready to handle alarms after alloc()
> 
ok, will clean that up and probably produce a -v3 this evening.

Regards,
Andreas