[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191129142212.GB3708031@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 15:22:12 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 3/3] debugfs: introduce debugfs_create_seq[,_data]
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 05:27:52PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Like proc_create_seq[,_data] in procfs, introduce a similar
> debugfs_create_seq[,_data] function, which could drastically
> reduces the boilerplate code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/debugfs/file.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/debugfs.h | 16 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/debugfs/file.c b/fs/debugfs/file.c
> index 68f0c4b19bef..77522717c9fb 100644
> --- a/fs/debugfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/debugfs/file.c
> @@ -1107,7 +1107,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_create_regset32);
> #endif /* CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM */
>
> struct debugfs_entry {
> - int (*read)(struct seq_file *seq, void *data);
> + union {
> + const struct seq_operations *seq_ops;
> + int (*read)(struct seq_file *seq, void *data);
> + };
> void *data;
> };
>
> @@ -1196,3 +1199,60 @@ struct dentry *debugfs_create_single_data(const char *name, umode_t mode,
> &debugfs_entry_ops);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_create_single_data);
> +
> +static int debugfs_entry_seq_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> + struct debugfs_entry *entry = inode->i_private;
> + int ret;
> +
> + entry = debugfs_clear_lowest_bit(entry);
> +
> + ret = seq_open(file, entry->seq_ops);
> + if (!ret && entry->data) {
> + struct seq_file *seq = file->private_data;
> + seq->private = entry->data;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations debugfs_seq_fops = {
> + .open = debugfs_entry_seq_open,
> + .read = seq_read,
> + .llseek = seq_lseek,
> + .release = seq_release,
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * debugfs_create_seq_data - create a file in the debugfs filesystem
> + * @name: a pointer to a string containing the name of the file to create.
> + * @mode: the permission that the file should have.
> + * @parent: a pointer to the parent dentry for this file. This should be a
> + * directory dentry if set. If this parameter is NULL, then the
> + * file will be created in the root of the debugfs filesystem.
> + * @data: a pointer to something that the caller will want to get to later
> + * on. The inode.i_private pointer will point to this value on
> + * the open() call.
> + * @seq_ops: seq_operations pointer of the seqfile.
> + *
> + * This function creates a file in debugfs with the extra data and a seq_ops.
> + */
> +struct dentry *debugfs_create_seq_data(const char *name, umode_t mode,
> + struct dentry *parent, void *data,
> + const struct seq_operations *seq_ops)
> +{
> + struct debugfs_entry *entry;
> +
> + entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!entry)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + entry->seq_ops = seq_ops;
> + entry->data = data;
> +
> + entry = debugfs_set_lowest_bit(entry);
> +
> + return debugfs_create_file(name, mode, parent, entry,
> + &debugfs_seq_fops);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_create_seq_data);
> diff --git a/include/linux/debugfs.h b/include/linux/debugfs.h
> index 82171f183e93..d32d49983547 100644
> --- a/include/linux/debugfs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/debugfs.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,10 @@ struct dentry *debugfs_create_single_data(const char *name, umode_t mode,
> int (*read_fn)(struct seq_file *s,
> void *data));
>
> +struct dentry *debugfs_create_seq_data(const char *name, umode_t mode,
> + struct dentry *parent, void *data,
> + const struct seq_operations *seq_ops);
> +
> bool debugfs_initialized(void);
>
> ssize_t debugfs_read_file_bool(struct file *file, char __user *user_buf,
If you notice, I have been removing the return value of the
debugfs_create_* functions over the past few kernel versions (look at
5.5-rc1 for a lot more). Please don't add any new functions that also
return a dentry that I then need to go and remove.
Just have these be void functions, no need to return anything.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists