lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42cc372e0ada4267bdf4038a0202d95d@EX13D32EUC003.ant.amazon.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Nov 2019 16:08:56 +0000
From:   "Durrant, Paul" <pdurrant@...zon.com>
To:     Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
CC:     "xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] xen/xenbus: reference count registered modules

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> Sent: 29 November 2019 16:01
> To: Durrant, Paul <pdurrant@...zon.com>
> Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org; linux-block@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>; Boris
> Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>; Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] xen/xenbus: reference count registered modules
> 
> On 29.11.2019 14:43, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > To prevent a module being removed whilst attached to a frontend, and
> 
> Why only frontend?
> 

True. Originally this was only intended for backends, but I guess this should now be 'otherend' or some equivalent form of words.

> > hence xenbus calling into potentially invalid text, take a reference on
> > the module before calling the probe() method (dropping it if
> unsuccessful)
> > and drop the reference after returning from the remove() method.
> >
> > NOTE: This allows the ad-hoc reference counting in xen-netback to be
> >       removed. This will be done in a subsequent patch.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@...zon.com>
> >
> > --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c
> > @@ -232,9 +232,11 @@ int xenbus_dev_probe(struct device *_dev)
> >  		return err;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	__module_get(drv->driver.owner);
> 
> I guess you really want try_module_get() and deal with it returning
> false.
> 

Perhaps, yes.

  Paul

> Jan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ