[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6483de2d-963c-3b5e-150a-641e070e3d0e@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 06:59:12 +0100
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen/events: remove event handling recursion detection
On 28.11.19 22:37, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/28/19 3:45 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> -
>> static void __xen_evtchn_do_upcall(void)
>> {
>> struct vcpu_info *vcpu_info = __this_cpu_read(xen_vcpu);
>> - int cpu = get_cpu();
>> - unsigned count;
>> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>>
>> do {
>> vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending = 0;
>>
>> - if (__this_cpu_inc_return(xed_nesting_count) - 1)
>> - goto out;
>> -
>> xen_evtchn_handle_events(cpu);
>>
>> BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
>>
>> - count = __this_cpu_read(xed_nesting_count);
>> - __this_cpu_write(xed_nesting_count, 0);
>> - } while (count != 1 || vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending);
>> -
>> -out:
>> + rmb(); /* Hypervisor can set upcall pending. */
>
> virt_rmb() perhaps then?
Yes, that's better.
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists