lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 30 Nov 2019 11:17:05 -0800
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
        Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rpmsg tree with the devicetree
 tree

On Thu 21 Nov 19:50 PST 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the rpmsg tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/stm32-rproc.txt
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   34376eb1b084 ("dt-bindings: remoteproc: convert stm32-rproc to json-schema")
> 
> from the devicetree tree and commit:
> 
>   14ea1d04ed0f ("dt-bindings: remoteproc: stm32: add wakeup-source")
> 
> from the rpmsg tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I just deleted the file - more updates may be required)
> and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> 

Thanks for catching this Stephen!

Regards,
Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ