[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <b1408bd6cc3f04fe22ce64f97174b6fbf9ffea40.1575144884.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 23:23:52 +0300
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, nivedita@...m.mit.edu,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] block: optimise bvec_iter_advance()
bvec_iter_advance() is quite popular, but compilers fail to do proper
alias analysis and optimise it good enough. The assembly is checked
for gcc 9.2, x86-64.
- remove @iter->bi_size from min(...), as it's always less than @bytes.
Modify at the beginning and forget about it.
- the compiler isn't able to collapse memory dependencies and remove
writes in the loop. Help it by explicitely using local vars.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
---
v2: simplify code (Arvind Sankar)
include/linux/bvec.h | 22 ++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bvec.h b/include/linux/bvec.h
index a032f01e928c..679a42253170 100644
--- a/include/linux/bvec.h
+++ b/include/linux/bvec.h
@@ -87,26 +87,24 @@ struct bvec_iter_all {
static inline bool bvec_iter_advance(const struct bio_vec *bv,
struct bvec_iter *iter, unsigned bytes)
{
+ unsigned int idx = iter->bi_idx;
+
if (WARN_ONCE(bytes > iter->bi_size,
"Attempted to advance past end of bvec iter\n")) {
iter->bi_size = 0;
return false;
}
- while (bytes) {
- const struct bio_vec *cur = bv + iter->bi_idx;
- unsigned len = min3(bytes, iter->bi_size,
- cur->bv_len - iter->bi_bvec_done);
-
- bytes -= len;
- iter->bi_size -= len;
- iter->bi_bvec_done += len;
+ iter->bi_size -= bytes;
+ bytes += iter->bi_bvec_done;
- if (iter->bi_bvec_done == cur->bv_len) {
- iter->bi_bvec_done = 0;
- iter->bi_idx++;
- }
+ while (bytes && bytes >= bv[idx].bv_len) {
+ bytes -= bv[idx].bv_len;
+ idx++;
}
+
+ iter->bi_idx = idx;
+ iter->bi_bvec_done = bytes;
return true;
}
--
2.24.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists