linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/7] fs: cifs: Delete usage of timespec64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABeXuvqpa4dx6MDwsG-J+1ZNF5FwhunraAKaE1-03Eehz22QiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 30 Nov 2019 21:35:01 -0800
From:   Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>,
        CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] fs: cifs: Delete usage of timespec64_trunc

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 1:25 PM Steve French <smfrench@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Is this intended to merge separately or do you want it merged through
> the cifs git tree?

It would be simplest for all uses of timespec64_trunc to be removed
through the same tree. Otherwise, whoever takes the [PATCH 6/7] ("fs:
Delete timespec64_trunc()") would have to depend on your tree.

Thanks,
-Deepa