[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <785fe04f-f841-3083-66db-53fab7bc0577@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 19:08:59 +0800
From: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
To: kungf <wings.wyang@...il.com>
Cc: kent.overstreet@...il.com, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: add REQ_FUA to avoid data lost in writeback mode
On 2019/12/2 6:24 下午, kungf wrote:
> data may lost when in the follow scene of writeback mode:
> 1. client write data1 to bcache
> 2. client fdatasync
> 3. bcache flush cache set and backing device
> if now data1 was not writed back to backing, it was only guaranteed safe in cache.
> 4.then cache writeback data1 to backing with only REQ_OP_WRITE
> So data1 was not guaranteed in non-volatile storage, it may lost if power interruption
>
Hi,
Do you encounter such problem in real work load ? With bcache journal, I
don't see the possibility of data lost with your description.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Coly Li
> Signed-off-by: kungf <wings.wyang@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> index 4a40f9eadeaf..e5cecb60569e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static void write_dirty(struct closure *cl)
> */
> if (KEY_DIRTY(&w->key)) {
> dirty_init(w);
> - bio_set_op_attrs(&io->bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0);
> + bio_set_op_attrs(&io->bio, REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_FUA, 0);
> io->bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = KEY_START(&w->key);
> bio_set_dev(&io->bio, io->dc->bdev);
> io->bio.bi_end_io = dirty_endio;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists