[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f0b6da2-15ca-a0cf-ba82-8bbb6af3bf81@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 07:03:59 -0600
From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
CC: <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, <pavel@....cz>,
<linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 10/19] ARM: dts: imx6dl-yapp4: Add reg property to the
lp5562 channel node
Shawn
On 12/2/19 3:06 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 07:30:14AM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Add the reg property to each channel node. This update is
>> to accomodate the multicolor framework. In addition to the
>> accomodation this allows the LEDs to be placed on any channel
>> and allow designs to skip channels as opposed to requiring
>> sequential order.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>> CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
>> CC: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
>> CC: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
>> CC: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
>> CC: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-yapp4-common.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-yapp4-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-yapp4-common.dtsi
>> index e8d800fec637..efc466ed1fea 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-yapp4-common.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-yapp4-common.dtsi
>> @@ -257,29 +257,35 @@
>> reg = <0x30>;
>> clock-mode = /bits/ 8 <1>;
>> status = "disabled";
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> - chan0 {
>> + chan@0 {
> Again, why do not we rename it to led@0 as you update the bindings in
> the last patch in the series?
I am trying to limit the amount of change in this patchset.
I know what you are asking is for a small change but that would be
another patch to the series to the label. I want to keep functional
changes like this isolated from clean up changes like you asked for
bissectability.
From that point we can make additional changes. I would really like
this to get into 5.6 as I thought I hit the merge window for 5.5 but it
did not make it.
Dan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists