[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+cpPppgVg_42m55DKOwA5uk7CLV_juDyCCECJMuuZYeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 11:09:40 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] dt-bindings: mfd: max77650: convert the binding
document to yaml
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 4:50 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2019, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>
> > pon., 11 lis 2019 o 09:08 Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> napisaĆ(a):
> > >
> > > On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> > > >
> > > > Convert the binding document for MAX77650 core MFD module to YAML.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77650.txt | 46 ------
> > > > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77650.yaml | 149 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> > > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77650.txt
> > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77650.yaml
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > FYI this series is already in next through Rob's DT tree.
>
> Why don't I see an 'applied' email?
There was discussion about it in the cover letter.
With the schema for MFDs, we need to merge all the schema thru one
tree because the main schema references the child node schemas.
Otherwise, 'make dt_binding_check' will start failing (as Linus' tree
is now). Perhaps we should encourage they be a single patche because
1) child devices alone don't make sense and 2) it will be clear not to
apply each separately.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists