linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] Documentation for 5.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191202001928.GA4146@latitude>
Date:   Mon, 2 Dec 2019 01:19:28 +0100
From:   Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
Subject: Re: [PULL] Documentation for 5.5

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 05:14:28PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
[...]
> All of the afflicted files arrived in that state as the result of a pair
> of patches from Jonathan (copied); I have verified that the original
> patches also had the DOS line endings.

Not sure why, or where in the mails' path this happened, but the base64
with CR/LF inside is also present in the copies that went directly to
me, rather than via the mailing lists.

> Anyway, if I revert the two offending patches and resend the pull, is that
> good enough, or do you want this mess out of the history entirely?

On a somewhat related note: "Documentation: networking: device drivers:
Remove stray asterisks" was also picked up via the networking tree.
Perhaps I should have mentioned that when I became aware(?)

> Sorry for the trouble,

Well, same here :/


Jonathan Neuschäfer

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)