[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABeXuvq1+t++mCT0xwcMMkwSWh7VxPTGP7zzFCiMC=vyz5bK-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:13:06 -0800
From: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] fs: Do not overload update_time
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 9:48 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 09:30:30PM -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > - int (*update_time)(struct inode *, struct timespec64 *, int);
> > + int (*cb)(struct inode *, struct timespec64 *, int);
> >
> > - update_time = inode->i_op->update_time ? inode->i_op->update_time :
> > + cb = inode->i_op->update_time ? inode->i_op->update_time :
> > generic_update_time;
> >
> > - return update_time(inode, time, flags);
> > + return cb(inode, time, flags);
>
> Just killing the pointless local variable cleans the function op, and
> also avoids the expensive indirect call for the common case:
Will update this in v2. Thanks.
-Deepa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists