[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191203213017.974005977@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 23:34:44 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.3 044/135] clk: ti: clkctrl: Fix failed to enable error with double udelay timeout
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
[ Upstream commit 81a41901ffd46bac6df4c95b8290ac259e0feda8 ]
Commit 3d8598fb9c5a ("clk: ti: clkctrl: use fallback udelay approach if
timekeeping is suspended") added handling for cases when timekeeping is
suspended. But looks like we can still get occasional "failed to enable"
errors on the PM runtime resume path with udelay() returning faster than
expected.
With ti-sysc interconnect target module driver this leads into device
failure with PM runtime failing with "failed to enable" clkctrl error.
Let's fix the issue with a delay of two times the desired delay as in
often done for udelay() to account for the inaccuracy.
Fixes: 3d8598fb9c5a ("clk: ti: clkctrl: use fallback udelay approach if timekeeping is suspended")
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190930154001.46581-1-tony@atomide.com
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c
index 975995eea15cb..b0c0690a5a121 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clkctrl.c
@@ -100,11 +100,12 @@ static bool _omap4_is_timeout(union omap4_timeout *time, u32 timeout)
* can be from a timer that requires pm_runtime access, which
* will eventually bring us here with timekeeping_suspended,
* during both suspend entry and resume paths. This happens
- * at least on am43xx platform.
+ * at least on am43xx platform. Account for flakeyness
+ * with udelay() by multiplying the timeout value by 2.
*/
if (unlikely(_early_timeout || timekeeping_suspended)) {
if (time->cycles++ < timeout) {
- udelay(1);
+ udelay(1 * 2);
return false;
}
} else {
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists