linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 117/321] btrfs: Check for missing device before bio submission in btrfs_map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue,  3 Dec 2019 23:33:03 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 117/321] btrfs: Check for missing device before bio submission in btrfs_map_bio

From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>

[ Upstream commit fc8a168aa9ab1680c2bd52bf9db7c994e0f2524f ]

Before btrfs_map_bio submits all stripe bios it does a number of checks
to ensure the device for every stripe is present. However, it doesn't do
a DEV_STATE_MISSING check, instead this is relegated to the lower level
btrfs_schedule_bio (in the async submission case, sync submission
doesn't check DEV_STATE_MISSING at all). Additionally
btrfs_schedule_bios does the duplicate device->bdev check which has
already been performed in btrfs_map_bio.

This patch moves the DEV_STATE_MISSING check in btrfs_map_bio and
removes the duplicate device->bdev check. Doing so ensures that no bio
cloning/submission happens for both async/sync requests in the face of
missing device. This makes the async io submission path slightly shorter
in terms of instruction count. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index a8297e7489d98..f84c18e86c816 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -6106,12 +6106,6 @@ static noinline void btrfs_schedule_bio(struct btrfs_device *device,
 	int should_queue = 1;
 	struct btrfs_pending_bios *pending_bios;
 
-	if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING, &device->dev_state) ||
-	    !device->bdev) {
-		bio_io_error(bio);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	/* don't bother with additional async steps for reads, right now */
 	if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_READ) {
 		btrfsic_submit_bio(bio);
@@ -6240,7 +6234,8 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
 
 	for (dev_nr = 0; dev_nr < total_devs; dev_nr++) {
 		dev = bbio->stripes[dev_nr].dev;
-		if (!dev || !dev->bdev ||
+		if (!dev || !dev->bdev || test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING,
+						   &dev->dev_state) ||
 		    (bio_op(first_bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE &&
 		    !test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &dev->dev_state))) {
 			bbio_error(bbio, first_bio, logical);
-- 
2.20.1