lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue,  3 Dec 2019 23:33:54 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 168/321] powerpc/44x/bamboo: Fix PCI range

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>

[ Upstream commit 3cfb9ebe906b51f2942b1e251009bb251efd2ba6 ]

The bamboo dts has a bug: it uses a non-naturally aligned range
for PCI memory space. This isnt' supported by the code, thus
causing PCI to break on this system.

This is due to the fact that while the chip memory map has 1G
reserved for PCI memory, it's only 512M aligned. The code doesn't
know how to split that into 2 different PMMs and fails, so limit
the region to 512M.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bamboo.dts | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bamboo.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bamboo.dts
index 538e42b1120d8..b5861fa3836c1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bamboo.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bamboo.dts
@@ -268,8 +268,10 @@
 			/* Outbound ranges, one memory and one IO,
 			 * later cannot be changed. Chip supports a second
 			 * IO range but we don't use it for now
+			 * The chip also supports a larger memory range but
+			 * it's not naturally aligned, so our code will break
 			 */
-			ranges = <0x02000000 0x00000000 0xa0000000 0x00000000 0xa0000000 0x00000000 0x40000000
+			ranges = <0x02000000 0x00000000 0xa0000000 0x00000000 0xa0000000 0x00000000 0x20000000
 				  0x02000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0xe0000000 0x00000000 0x00100000
 				  0x01000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0xe8000000 0x00000000 0x00010000>;
 
-- 
2.20.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ