linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 171/321] drbd: ignore "all zero" peer volume sizes in handshake

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191203223436.029373914@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  3 Dec 2019 23:33:57 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 171/321] drbd: ignore "all zero" peer volume sizes in handshake

From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>

[ Upstream commit 94c43a13b8d6e3e0dd77b3536b5e04a84936b762 ]

During handshake, if we are diskless ourselves, we used to accept any size
presented by the peer.

Which could be zero if that peer was just brought up and connected
to us without having a disk attached first, in which case both
peers would just "flip" their volume sizes.

Now, even a diskless node will ignore "zero" sizes
presented by a diskless peer.

Also a currently Diskless Primary will refuse to shrink during handshake:
it may be frozen, and waiting for a "suitable" local disk or peer to
re-appear (on-no-data-accessible suspend-io). If the peer is smaller
than what we used to be, it is not suitable.

The logic for a diskless node during handshake is now supposed to be:
believe the peer, if
 - I don't have a current size myself
 - we agree on the size anyways
 - I do have a current size, am Secondary, and he has the only disk
 - I do have a current size, am Primary, and he has the only disk,
   which is larger than my current size

Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
index 3cdadf75c82da..c9e8d61dea248 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
@@ -3980,6 +3980,7 @@ static int receive_sizes(struct drbd_connection *connection, struct packet_info
 	struct o_qlim *o = (connection->agreed_features & DRBD_FF_WSAME) ? p->qlim : NULL;
 	enum determine_dev_size dd = DS_UNCHANGED;
 	sector_t p_size, p_usize, p_csize, my_usize;
+	sector_t new_size, cur_size;
 	int ldsc = 0; /* local disk size changed */
 	enum dds_flags ddsf;
 
@@ -3987,6 +3988,7 @@ static int receive_sizes(struct drbd_connection *connection, struct packet_info
 	if (!peer_device)
 		return config_unknown_volume(connection, pi);
 	device = peer_device->device;
+	cur_size = drbd_get_capacity(device->this_bdev);
 
 	p_size = be64_to_cpu(p->d_size);
 	p_usize = be64_to_cpu(p->u_size);
@@ -3997,7 +3999,6 @@ static int receive_sizes(struct drbd_connection *connection, struct packet_info
 	device->p_size = p_size;
 
 	if (get_ldev(device)) {
-		sector_t new_size, cur_size;
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		my_usize = rcu_dereference(device->ldev->disk_conf)->disk_size;
 		rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -4015,7 +4016,6 @@ static int receive_sizes(struct drbd_connection *connection, struct packet_info
 		/* Never shrink a device with usable data during connect.
 		   But allow online shrinking if we are connected. */
 		new_size = drbd_new_dev_size(device, device->ldev, p_usize, 0);
-		cur_size = drbd_get_capacity(device->this_bdev);
 		if (new_size < cur_size &&
 		    device->state.disk >= D_OUTDATED &&
 		    device->state.conn < C_CONNECTED) {
@@ -4080,9 +4080,36 @@ static int receive_sizes(struct drbd_connection *connection, struct packet_info
 		 *
 		 * However, if he sends a zero current size,
 		 * take his (user-capped or) backing disk size anyways.
+		 *
+		 * Unless of course he does not have a disk himself.
+		 * In which case we ignore this completely.
 		 */
+		sector_t new_size = p_csize ?: p_usize ?: p_size;
 		drbd_reconsider_queue_parameters(device, NULL, o);
-		drbd_set_my_capacity(device, p_csize ?: p_usize ?: p_size);
+		if (new_size == 0) {
+			/* Ignore, peer does not know nothing. */
+		} else if (new_size == cur_size) {
+			/* nothing to do */
+		} else if (cur_size != 0 && p_size == 0) {
+			drbd_warn(device, "Ignored diskless peer device size (peer:%llu != me:%llu sectors)!\n",
+					(unsigned long long)new_size, (unsigned long long)cur_size);
+		} else if (new_size < cur_size && device->state.role == R_PRIMARY) {
+			drbd_err(device, "The peer's device size is too small! (%llu < %llu sectors); demote me first!\n",
+					(unsigned long long)new_size, (unsigned long long)cur_size);
+			conn_request_state(peer_device->connection, NS(conn, C_DISCONNECTING), CS_HARD);
+			return -EIO;
+		} else {
+			/* I believe the peer, if
+			 *  - I don't have a current size myself
+			 *  - we agree on the size anyways
+			 *  - I do have a current size, am Secondary,
+			 *    and he has the only disk
+			 *  - I do have a current size, am Primary,
+			 *    and he has the only disk,
+			 *    which is larger than my current size
+			 */
+			drbd_set_my_capacity(device, new_size);
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (get_ldev(device)) {
-- 
2.20.1