lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191203213011.737005692@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  3 Dec 2019 23:34:29 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.3 029/135] clk: sunxi: Fix operator precedence in sunxi_divs_clk_setup

From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit afdc74ed2d57e86c10b1d6831339770a802bab9a ]

r375326 in Clang exposes an issue with operator precedence in
sunxi_div_clk_setup:

drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: warning: operator '?:' has lower
precedence than '|'; '|' will be evaluated first
[-Wbitwise-conditional-parentheses]
                                                 data->div[i].critical ?
                                                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: note: place parentheses around
the '|' expression to silence this warning
                                                 data->div[i].critical ?
                                                                       ^
                                                                      )
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: note: place parentheses around
the '?:' expression to evaluate it first
                                                 data->div[i].critical ?
                                                                       ^
                                                 (
1 warning generated.

It appears that the intention was for ?: to be evaluated first so that
CLK_IS_CRITICAL could be added to clkflags if the critical boolean was
set; right now, | is being evaluated first. Add parentheses around the
?: block to have it be evaluated first.

Fixes: 9919d44ff297 ("clk: sunxi: Use CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for critical clks")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/745
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
index d3a43381a7927..27201fd26e442 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
@@ -1080,8 +1080,8 @@ static struct clk ** __init sunxi_divs_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
 						 rate_hw, rate_ops,
 						 gate_hw, &clk_gate_ops,
 						 clkflags |
-						 data->div[i].critical ?
-							CLK_IS_CRITICAL : 0);
+						 (data->div[i].critical ?
+							CLK_IS_CRITICAL : 0));
 
 		WARN_ON(IS_ERR(clk_data->clks[i]));
 	}
-- 
2.20.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ