linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/132] 4.4.204-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 2 Dec 2019 21:25:55 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/132] 4.4.204-stable review

On 11/29/19 12:53 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 06:59:17PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 02:04, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.204 release.
>>> There are 132 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Fri, 29 Nov 2019 20:18:09 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>          https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.204-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>          git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>
>> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> As you all are doing run-time tests, it would be interesting to see why
> I saw failures in the Android networking tests with this and the 4.9
> queue, but they did not show up in your testing :(
> 

Did you solve this problem, or am I going to get into trouble when I merge this
release ?

Guenter