[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <157535317763.16485.12112495601308191775.stgit@devnote2>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:06:17 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -tip V2 1/2] kprobes: Suppress the suspicious RCU warning on kprobes
Anders reported that the lockdep warns that suspicious
RCU list usage in register_kprobe() (detected by
CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST.) This is because get_kprobe()
access kprobe_table[] by hlist_for_each_entry_rcu()
without rcu_read_lock.
If we call get_kprobe() from the breakpoint handler context,
it is run with preempt disabled, so this is not a problem.
But in other cases, instead of rcu_read_lock(), we locks
kprobe_mutex so that the kprobe_table[] is not updated.
So, current code is safe, but still not good from the view
point of RCU.
Joel suggested that we can silent that warning by passing
lockdep_is_held() to the last argument of
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu().
Add lockdep_is_held(&kprobe_mutex) at the end of the
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() to suppress the warning.
Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 53534aa258a6..f9ecb6d532fb 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -326,7 +326,8 @@ struct kprobe *get_kprobe(void *addr)
struct kprobe *p;
head = &kprobe_table[hash_ptr(addr, KPROBE_HASH_BITS)];
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(p, head, hlist) {
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(p, head, hlist,
+ lockdep_is_held(&kprobe_mutex)) {
if (p->addr == addr)
return p;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists