lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Dec 2019 17:02:54 +0800
From:   Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, kbuild@...ts.01.org,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH next 2/3] debugfs: introduce
 debugfs_create_single[,_data]



On 12/3/19 4:38 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> [ How do I fetch 0day git branchs?
>    git fetch https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Kefeng-Wang/debugfs-introduce-debugfs_create_single-seq-_data/20191129-173440
>    doesn't work. - dan ]

Hi Dan,

I can fetch it by the following steps:

nfs@...o2-debian:~/linux$ git remote add 0day-linux-review 
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux.git
nfs@...o2-debian:~/linux$ git fetch --no-tags 0day-linux-review 
Kefeng-Wang/debugfs-introduce-debugfs_create_single-seq-_data/20191129-173440 

remote: Enumerating objects: 25261, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (25261/25261), done.
remote: Total 33246 (delta 25260), reused 25260 (delta 25260), 
pack-reused 7985
Receiving objects: 100% (33246/33246), 12.03 MiB | 1.05 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (28148/28148), completed with 6149 local objects.
 From https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
  * branch 
Kefeng-Wang/debugfs-introduce-debugfs_create_single-seq-_data/20191129-173440 
-> FETCH_HEAD
  * [new branch] 
Kefeng-Wang/debugfs-introduce-debugfs_create_single-seq-_data/20191129-173440 
-> 
0day-linux-review/Kefeng-Wang/debugfs-introduce-debugfs_create_single-seq-_data/20191129-173440

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

>
> Hi Kefeng,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on next-20191128]
> [cannot apply to v5.4]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Kefeng-Wang/debugfs-introduce-debugfs_create_single-seq-_data/20191129-173440
> base:    d26b0e226f222c22c3b7e9d16e5b886e7c51057a
>
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>
> New smatch warnings:
> fs/debugfs/file.c:1193 debugfs_create_single_data() warn: overwrite may leak 'entry'
>
> Old smatch warnings:
> include/linux/compiler.h:247 __write_once_size() warn: potential memory corrupting cast 8 vs 4 bytes
>
> # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/198a4ea9768d6790a169e8b802e702c208aafbd1
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> git remote update linux-review
> git checkout 198a4ea9768d6790a169e8b802e702c208aafbd1
> vim +/entry +1193 fs/debugfs/file.c
>
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1179  struct dentry *debugfs_create_single_data(const char *name, umode_t mode,
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1180  					  struct dentry *parent, void *data,
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1181  					  int (*read_fn)(struct seq_file *s,
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1182  							 void *data))
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1183  {
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1184  	struct debugfs_entry *entry;
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1185
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1186  	entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1187  	if (!entry)
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1188  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1189
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1190  	entry->read = read_fn;
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1191  	entry->data = data;
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29  1192
> 198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang      2019-11-29 @1193  	entry = debugfs_set_lowest_bit(entry);
>                                                          ^^^^^^^^
> I haven't looked at the surrounding code but how would we free "entry"
> when we write over it here?
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all@...ts.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave@...ts.01.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ